Re: Plonely in Austin

Jean Jordaan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel
Message-ID <CAJqnznA4KrH4+T1fiGyJhUCX1m0XGd0_dGAXj0DpvRAzi5nQTA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Guido Stevens <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK we agree on the problem.
>
> But any attempt at a solution risks becoming http://xkcd.com/927/

Yeah, that's a very real risk.

> I don't think any technology can fundamentally change the community dynamic.
> Unless the community dynamic is changing already and the technology supports
> a transition which is already underway. But I don't see that, yet, though I
> see the need.

>From another angle: technology does change the dynamic, but you can't force
the technology on the community, and you can't dictate the nature of the
change either.

You can try to lure in people by example, and putting some tools in place,
and building on that.

Sorry for throwing around the plonesocial name recklessly ;-)

-- 
jean                                              . .. .... //\\\oo///\\

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.