Re: publishTraverse, acquisition and multiple urls for the same content

This is a test for traversing images:

https://github.com/collective/experimental.noacquisition/blob/master/src/experimental/noacquisition/tests/test_bad_acquisition.py#L62

that I think fails with current implementation on
https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/tree/publication-through-explicit-acquisition
and
https://github.com/collective/collective.explicitacquisition

I'll try to copy the test also on the collective.explicitacquisition
<https://github.com/collective/collective.explicitacquisition>, and make
the test suggested by Dylan.

https://github.com/collective/experimental.noacquisition is my different
implementation that implements an ugly monkey patch on ZPublisher, I'll
happy if collective.explicitacquisition
<https://github.com/collective/collective.explicitacquisition> make the
same job without monkey patching.

Mauro.


On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Godefroid Chapelle <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Le 25/09/14 06:41, Dylan Jay a écrit :
> > On 25 Sep 2014, at 11:17 am, Johannes Raggam<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> >> >I also run into this problem today and factored out gotcha's code
> >> >regardinghttps://dev.plone.org/ticket/13793  from
> >> >
> https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/tree/publication-through-explicit-acquisition
> >> >into a seperate package:
> >> >
> >> >https://github.com/collective/collective.explicitacquisition
> >> >
> >> >That's exactly his implementation as a separate package. Easy and
> >> >unobtrusive to include, and got no problems with it so far.
> >> >
> >> >Mauro, which problems with image scaling did you have? I didn't
> encouter
> >> >problems until now...
> > I notice it doesn't also fix the case of dirs being acquired.
> > For example
> >
> > news/item1
> > sub/news/item1
> >
> > If sub/news was deleted from sub it's urls would still work and not
> raise a 404.
> > Anyone see a reason not to extend this patch to disallow acquisition of
> any part of the path, not just the context?
>
>
> Nope, would you mind adding a test ?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
> Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
> Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
> Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Plone-developers mailing list
> Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Plone-developers mailing list
Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers