Re: RFC: Proposal Dexterity API - two variants
Robert Niederreiter <rnix-vzgNpXZZ1Rwgm7i/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 2014-11-05 um 23:43 schrieb David Glick (Plone): > On 11/5/14, 2:37 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: >> >> Behaviours are not and were never designed to be a way simply to >> build reusable fields. > > Well, we need a better way to do reusable fields then. I really think behaviors should become the default way for building reusable fields. What's the option? Introducing a new concept? Subclassing (not reusable TTW then)? Behaviors are already there and working, Providing all the hooks some need to integrate to plone... except an explicit API ;) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Plone-developers mailing list > Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers