Re: Deprecation done right?
Martin Opstad Reistadbakk <martior-z4DKO/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel,gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.teams.framework |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACT3qOdXzMhDjam+Eim66DCv1E1PE0xX190M7N-KxzLq1nmp3w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dylan Jay <djay-n0pU0XVUApFWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 26 Nov 2014, at 4:50 pm, Alexander Pilz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I want to raise an idea that has helped us a lot in the past. > > > > We wanted to massively reduce the work to create releases but didn't > want to refactor too much code to achieve that. In the end, we combined > several packages which anyway had the same namespace into one repository. > We now only release one egg which contains them all. > > > > An example for this is the Euphorie project at > https://github.com/euphorie/Euphorie > > > > We release the Euphorie egg and it contains euphorie.client, > euphorie.content, euphorie.deployment and euphorie.tests. When moving the > github repositories, it is possible to keep the history as well. > > > > I wonder whether it would be possible to create e.g. a PloneApp egg like > this. > > +1 > Also +1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers