Re: Stack Exchange Q&A site proposal: Plone

On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 21:41 -0500, Eric Steele wrote:


> So in a "Plone needs to evangelize more" respect, SO-proper gives us
> exposure to people who wouldn't otherwise see us, SO-Plone gives us a
> shiny "We have our own StackOverflow site". Is one of these more valid
> than the other?

2nd one, IMO.

i don't think plone on StackOverflow without a own SO site would give us
more exposure to non-plone users. my SO search engine in the first place
is google and not SO.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
Plone-developers mailing list
Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlSEKSQACgkQW4mNMQxDgAfBwQCguDFAlUlnsW1t8MRa16X+uDwU
ff4AoMOP5AfYvUoBauAqmei6vkMLDlib
=CGpM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----