Re: split of mockup / plone.mockup
Johannes Raggam <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, good arguments! That was a quick shot from me, sorry. But I think we agree, that Mockup needs to be a bower installable package. So, Timo's point is, that we need for each commit on mockup a corresponding commit on plone.mockup to get understandable and reproducable Jenkins result. As far as I understood it (didn't try out yet), ``git subtree``, instead of ``git submodules`` might be able to solve this problem. See: http://blogs.atlassian.com/2013/05/alternatives-to-git-submodule-git-subtree/ I'm not sure how this works out with mr.developer. Maybe we need some Github Webhooks to update the subtree on every Mockup commit. Johannes On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 15:41 -0300, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: > Hi, > > > I don't know if this is relevant, and you might already be aware of > it, but I'd just like to point out that, with git submodules, the > submodule is pinned to a specific commit (hash), not a specific branch > of the referenced repository. > > > In practice this means that, for the `plone.mockup` repository to pick > up a new commit/release/branch/whatever of the `mockup` submodule, a > new commit needs to be added to the `plone.mockup` repository picking > up this new commit (hash) of the submodule. > > > This also means that any CI that monitors a branch (or master) of the > `plone.mockup` repository and blindly calls `submodule update` on it > whenever it detects a new commit on the `plone.mockup` will > automatically pick up changes in the submodules without any added > detection complexity. > > > Cheers, > > > Leo > > On 9 March 2015 at 15:26, Timo Stollenwerk <tisto-z4DKO/[email protected]> wrote: > Am 09.03.15 um 19:08 schrieb Timo Stollenwerk: > > Hi Johannes, > > > > making mockup installable via bower is a worthwile goal. > Thanks for > > working on that! > > > > Though, I see a problem with using git submodules. It is > already quite > > hard to create a proper CI setup on top of mr.developer, and > using git > > submodules will make this even harder. Here is why: > > > > We are basically nesting our development packages into our > main > > repository with mr.developer. This makes it hard to > impossible to > > trigger one Jenkins job per commit (we tried very smart > stuff with > > mr.roboto and we failed miserably, you have to store every > single hash > > value and every version pinning for each pkg and re-run > buildout with > > this). We are still aiming for 1 commit = 1 build. Though, > adding a > > second nested level (git submodules) within our already > nested setup > > will make this impossible. We might be able to somehow pin > our modules > > if we do releases in the future. We are not going to be able > to do this > > in a structure that is nested twice. > > > > Futhermore, my personal experience with git submodules is > that even when > > working with in manually, it is nothing but unpredictable > pain. > > > > In addition to the uncertainty that buildout and > mr.developer already > > put into our CI setup, you just introduced another one. > > > > I think we should try to find another way to solve this > problem. I'm not > > sure if we still take "mockup should be used outside Plone" > seriously. > > Though, in any case I think we should test and release > mockup > > separately. What if the mockup CI system (travis?) creates a > new release > > if all unit tests pass. The Plone CI could pick up the > latest release > > and we would just have to make sure the travis job triggers > the Jenkins > > CI. Plone would just install the latest mockup development > version via > > bower. > > > Sorry, I mixed things up with the CI pipeline for my current > project. :) > > We do not want to run npm/bower on our Jenkins job. Therefore > we would > need a Python egg for each mockup commit that can be picked up > by the > Jenkins job instead of a bower release. I guess we could set > up a > private pypi for that if necessary. > > Cheers, > Timo > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel > Website, sponsored > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is > your hub for all > things parallel software development, from weekly thought > leadership blogs to > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look > and join the > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ > Plone-developers mailing list > Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored > by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all > things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to > news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the > conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 181 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlT9/UQACgkQW4mNMQxDgAdX5QCdEdwI08OJysSxT+oSvnsy0Zw6 0hUAn0olGCKZkKP9Dr0raVnVG3Nz1vLY =zlIp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----