Re: Plone 3.2 User Manual Update

"Jeff Pittman" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yes, keeping the editable prose in Plone is the way to go -- sorry to have
suggested svn for this.

For developing a system of updating the screen captures and other
analytical/update work done independently on the user manual -- independent
of the standard prose editing in place on plone.org -- the html of the prose
could be grabbed over the top with a scrape, or via a custom script on
plone.org.  A python/filesystem approach could be developed in parallel for
doing the automation by parsing the html/restructured text.  A parallel html
version of the user manual could be rendered on the desktop for inspection
as you work on the screen captures, and fresh images/media could be uploaded
in bulk when done.

Jeff

Jeff Pittman
http://www.geojeff.org


On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Steve McMahon <[email protected]> wrote:

> Automating the screenshots is totally cool. It's the editable prose
> that we'd like to keep inside the CMS, where it can be worked on by
> prose writers who aren't necessarily comfortable with svn and
> particular markup schemes.
>
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Jeff Pittman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > The screen capture facility would be accomplished, I imagine, with a
> driver
> > script operating on hooks (special codes) in the docs to drive the
> browser
> > and captures -- or such a script developed in parallel.
> >
> > Regarding complication of such a system, having a driver system in python
> is
> > not a bad thing -- we are a python house, ultimately. :)
> >
> > And, I wouldn't want us to shy away from innovation.  Such an approach
> > inherently requires an intelligent system, for which we are fully capable
> of
> > designing and maintaining.  It would be like other complicated python
> > scripts I use on the command line -- a chore to build, but once they
> work,
> > they become workhorse utilities.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > Jeff Pittman
> > http://www.geojeff.org
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 12:18 PM, JoAnna Springsteen <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Jeff Pittman <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Also, at a recent sprint, there was an exploration of automation for
> >> > screen
> >> > captures for the user manual and other documentation needs.
> >>
> >> Yup. Seems like we've been talking about this since the PSU symposium.
> >> I know Paul Everitt had thoughts on how this could be done too.
> >> Not sure if anything ever came of it though.
> >> Would still be interested in hearing how we could accomplish this
> >> without making it hugely complicated.
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Plone-docs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Steve McMahon
> Reid-McMahon, LLC
> steve-HR5nRXif9uVv8oa/[email protected]
> [email protected]
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Plone-docs mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Plone-docs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.