Re: Plone 3.2 User Manual Update

Veda Williams <veda-PRw/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation
Message-ID <C5750ED3.86CD%[email protected]>
Is there enough of a difference between Plone 3.0 and 3.2 to warrant a new
manual? I¹d think we¹d only want to maintain a canonical manual for major
versions, not for incremental releases.

And yes, screencasts would be great. I¹m leaning towards using the media
server, as plone.tv doesn¹t allow videos to be shown at their full
resolution and thus don¹t have a lot of value. I believe that Nate Aune is
working on this, but we should have an alternate plan in place.

- Veda


On 12/20/08 2:50 AM, "Jeff Pittman" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am interested in working on a Plone 3.2 version of the user manual. One way
> of doing it is to copy the 3.0 version (manual content type in PHC), then
> modifying in place for 3.2. That's what we did when we made a 3.0 manual from
> the 2.5 version. Steve, iirc, you did something special to copy it?
> 
> New screen captures, updated text, and replacement screencasts will be needed.
> 
> The screencasts are stored outside of the manual, on Plone's media server. I
> have Screenflow for making screencasts, and I think these are really important
> to weave into the user manual, even more than we did for the previous
> versions. Sam, I've been meaning to ask you about your current
> screencast-making routine -- Veda mentioned jing...
> 
> Jeff
> 
> Jeff Pittman
> http://www.geojeff.org
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Plone-docs mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Plone-docs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.