Re: plone.org has been upgraded! - next steps
Veda Williams <veda-PRw/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C5813E00.88B6%[email protected]> |
You're going to sniff out docs that have more than one section specified so that we can deselect sections that aren't relevant, right? On 12/31/08 2:01 PM, "Steve McMahon" <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to clarify, my intention is to script the movement of > *everything* in how-to and tutorial to the knowledgebase, *except*: > > 1) Documents that are not published or have no sections specified. > > 2) Content identified for inclusion in an already-existing manual. > That will be turned into a manual section. > > I may see if we can repurpose new.plone.org (now that the Plone 3 > switch is done) to test and check the scripted part of the > reorganization. > > Steve > > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Veda Williams <veda-PRw/[email protected]> wrote: >> Steve, let me know what you need from me. My notes from the Seattle >> migration discussion, with thoughts on scripts that might be needed are >> here: >> >> http://www.openplans.org/projects/plone-documentation/here/ >> >> I'd also like to state that for sections that are behind in their >> assessments, we should at least do a quick pass thru them to find out which >> ones can be dumped out to the knowledgebase area. The deeper assessment can >> probably happen separately from this. >> >> Joanna, how are we on the areas that are straggling? Do we have people >> assigned to do the work? If not, can we identify specific people we can pull >> in? Maybe Joel? >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Veda >> >> >> On 12/31/08 8:55 AM, "Steve McMahon" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> Veda, Steve, I guess you can give us an update on that, right? >>> >>> The technical parts of this reorganization are my project for the >>> week. Limi's working on templates. >>> >>> IMHO, the most critical thing the doc team / editors can be doing >>> right now is identifying any existing content in the how-to / tutorial >>> sections that needs to move into manuals. I can script those moves, >>> but will need ids for the sources and targets. >>> >>> Also, for any how-to / tutorial content moving to manuals, we need to >>> contact the principal authors to make sure they're going to be >>> amenable to signing something similar to the Plone committer's >>> agreement and dedicating their work to the Plone Foundation. >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Israel Saeta Pérez <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Now that plone.org has been upgraded I think we should decide how will we >>>> manage some stuff: >>>> >>>> Migration to official docs & knowledge base. >>>> Getting rid of classification by content-type in favour of classification >>>> by >>>> topic. >>>> Merging official docs contents into a bunch of manuals, by topic. >>>> Alert to the editors mailing list when a new document arrives to the review >>>> queue. >>>> Managing PLIP's changes reflection into documentation. >>>> ... >>>> >>>> Veda, Steve, I guess you can give us an update on that, right? >>>> >>>> -- israel >>>> >>>> >>>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> - >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Plone-docs mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------