Re: plone.org has been upgraded! - next steps
Veda Williams <veda-PRw/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <C58548ED.D175%[email protected]> |
No harm in that. On 1/1/09 1:10 PM, "Steve McMahon" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Does that mean these documents will go to the knowledgebase first and we >> will pick and integrate them in manuals later? > > What if the script *copies* (rather than *moving*) the contents of > identified how-tos into manual sections, setting the destination "in > progress"? > > Then, the how-to can be removed after manual integration. We'll need > to make sure to set a redirect from the source to the destination upon > the completed integration. > > On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Israel Saeta Pérez <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Steve McMahon wrote: >>> >>> Just to clarify, my intention is to script the movement of >>> *everything* in how-to and tutorial to the knowledgebase, *except*: >>> >>> 1) Documents that are not published or have no sections specified. >>> >>> 2) Content identified for inclusion in an already-existing manual. >>> That will be turned into a manual section. >>> >>> I may see if we can repurpose new.plone.org (now that the Plone 3 >>> switch is done) to test and check the scripted part of the >>> reorganization. >> >> In the case of the development section, there are a lot of documents which >> could be merged with existing manuals or serve as a base for new ones, but >> they need integration work and can't become part of a manual without >> adapting them. >> >> Does that mean these documents will go to the knowledgebase first and we >> will pick and integrate them in manuals later? >> >> -- israel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------