Re: Documenting Packages for Future Developers
"Israel Saeta Pérez" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Dylan, We're already collaborating with the Framework Team to try to document changes introduced by the accepted PLIPs in each version. Hopefully this will help us to keep official documentation a bit more up to date. :-) Regarding the big-manual thing, I think we should keep documentation as modular as possible because: - It makes easier to edit a page without worrying too much about breaking other parts of the documentation. - it allows readers to find and read only the pages they need to perform a certain task, without having to read the whole big-manual like if it were a book. But I'm open to contra-arguments. We reference some manuals from other ones when necessary, e.g. the GenericSetup manual from the Archetypes manual when explaining the GS bits, and avoid duplicating already existing information (hyperlinks are our friends), to keep the documentation as cohesive as possible. I formerly thought we needed to explain how all parts of Plone fit together, but now I realize the complexity of Plone and Zope makes this too hard (and probably unnecessary) and a manual for each main topic is fairly enough. -- israel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword