Re: Documenting Plone 3.3 PLIPs -- assignments and further work (moved from plone-docs)
JoAnna Springsteen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for taking the initiative on this Israel. I'm moving on Friday so for about the next week I'll be missing. Will pick up on hounding everyone about deadlines once I'm settled. (including these) J. On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Israel Saeta Pérez <[email protected]> wrote: > I've already assigned all the tickets to current editors using my own > criteria. Please check the list and reassign them if needed. To work on them > I suggest following this process: > > Make a list of documents affected. This list may include only documents > which are selected to go to the official documentation area. > Make a copy of them and find someone to document the changes. > Ask the implementer of each PLIP to review the introduced documentation > changes. > After the 3.3 release, copy the contents of the copied articles back to the > live ones, and delete the copies. > > I wouldn't like us to fail at this point because I feel that, if we fail > documenting 3.3 PLIPs, we will disappoint the whole framework team and they > won't trust us going to do this anymore. > > Go, editors, go! > > -- israel > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Israel Saeta Pérez <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Previously Israel Saeta Pérez wrote: >>> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Israel Saeta Pérez >>> > <[email protected]>wrote: >>> > >>> > > I've filed some bugs in Trac on the documentation component regarding >>> > > Plone 3.3 accepted PLIPs >>> > > documentation<https://dev.plone.org/plone/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&component=Documentation&milestone=3.3&order=priority> >>> > > . >>> > > >>> > >>> > I've already seen some 3.3 PLIPs implementation announcements in the >>> > framework-team mailing list describing what documentation changes would >>> > be >>> > needed. Should we assign the related documentation tickets to avoid >>> > leaving >>> > this task undone? >>> >>> Is this making any progress? >> >> I've added some documentation info from the framework-team list messages >> to each ticket. >> >>> >>> I'ld suggest to just go ahead and assign tickets to people. >> >> >> I've already assigned some of them, but I'd prefer our editors to have a >> look at the tickets and accept the ones belonging to their sections. >> >> >> -- israel >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Plone-docs mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword