Re: Keep documentation for previous versions when updating it to reflect new behaviour and features

Raphael Ritz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Veda Williams wrote:
> The goal is to release documentation that is older into the broader
> "knowledgebase" space. And Joanna's right, we won't be removing any
> documentation, we're just going to flush it out of the core documentation
> area.
> 
> Since we're moving toward a manual-based system, it makes sense to create
> them in a way that we can flag them as being specific to a given major
> version of Plone. 
> 
> Within a given version, we can still indicate where something applies to 3.3
> or 3.4 within the 3.x manual, since there will obviously be incremental
> change, but I don't think we should have new manuals for minor versions of
> Plone, just from the maintenance standpoint.

Once we have the manual in place - and it looks like we come a long way
already - I'm not sure it would produce much of a maintenance overhead
to even release the manual for minor versions.

Just look at, e.g., http://www.python.org/doc/versions/
Most of the stuff there is identical across versions but as Dylan
points out this is much easier to deal with from a user's point
of view.

Raphael

> 
> - Veda
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.