Re: Keep documentation for previous versions when updating it to reflect new behaviour and features
Israel Saeta Pérez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> wrote: > Previously JoAnna Springsteen wrote: >> > Part of the original reason for this email is that we had a small burp in >> > our process. In Plone 3.3, the way versioning is displayed/implemented is >> > completely different than it is in versions 3.0-3.2. >> >> This is the kind of stuff that the framework team shouldn't be doing. >> tsk tsk. /me wags finger > > Yes and no. I agree this change changes behaviour in a way that people > might not be expecting, which is not desirable in the 3.x series. There > were two good reasons to still make it though: most packages keep the > version numbers in setup.py, version.txt and metadata.xml in sync and > will see no change, and Plone no longer mixes up profile and package > versions which was a bug and was starting to confuse people. The > distinction is important, and I felt that this was warranted to set > things straight. As far as I've understood, Darci was talking about: * Versioning (Plone v3.0 - Plone v3.2): http://plone.org/documentation/manual/plone-3-user-manual/managing-content/versioning-plone-v3.0-plone-v3.2 * Versioning (Plone v3.3+) : http://plone.org/documentation/manual/plone-3-user-manual/managing-content/versioning-plone-v3.3 not about the changes in the QuickInstaller. -- israel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p