Re: Plone 3.5

Am Tue, 05 May 2009 15:37:55 +0200 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:

> Previously Andreas Zeidler wrote:
>> Andreas Zeidler wrote:
>> >Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> >>The general idea that seems to have met some consensus is to go for a
>> >>Plone 3.5 release up next.
>> >
>> >sounds good to me, +1.
>> 
>> actually, i think it should still be plone 4.0 (with the remaining
>> features deferred to 5.0 or later).  otherwise i think it's a good idea
>> in the sense of "release early, release often".
> 
> +1
> 
> In hindsight I feel it was a mistake to assign a version number to Plone
> trunk. It might end up being Plone 5, 6, 7 or 3000. Using Plone 4
> instead of 3.5 means that we will not break  our promise to never break
> stability in the 3.x, something I feel quite strongly about.

I just can say here: I agree to delay features and make the next major 
4.0 and not 3.5. Dont make the same mistakes again (looking at 2.5).

regards Jens
-- 
Jens W. Klein - Klein & Partner KEG - BlueDynamics Alliance