Re: [Framework-Team] The new Plone 4.0, was Re: Plone 3.5

David Glick <davidglick-PRw/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation,gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel,gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.teams.framework
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Just catching up here on the west coast of the US...

+1 on the modified proposal of aiming for a "less risky" release  
called Plone 4.0, with the caveats that:
- The release needs to offer improvements of significant value to  
justify the effort in upgrading (Hanno's spreadsheet of proposed  
changes and where they might land looks good to me overall)
- We need to nail the upgrade story and documentation of changes.

+1 for Eric Steele as release manager for 4.0 (with Hanno continuing  
to oversee Plone trunk)

David

On May 5, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:

> Hi.
>
> To summarize the feedback from the European time zone, I think that  
> the
> proposal in general meets the favor of everyone.
>
> The controversial issue is the exact version number to use for the
> release. There seems to be broad support for freeing the current Plone
> trunk from a version designator and release a 4.0 release with the
> envisioned scope of this proposal instead.
>
> If I do not get a strong signal or message otherwise, consider this
> proposal changed in this regard.
>
> Hanno
>
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> While everyone is waiting for Plone 4 and its rather long timeline,  
>> some
>> people have been thinking about how to bridge the gap between the
>> current stable 3.x releases and the future.
>>
>> The general idea that seems to have met some consensus is to go for a
>> Plone 3.5 release up next. We'd skip any 3.4 release and go for a 3.5
>> that is similar in spirit to the Plone 2.5 release. It tries to both
>> refresh some of our technical underpinnings in addition to some more
>> intrusive feature changes we didn't allow ourselves in the 3.x  
>> series so
>> far.
>>
>> In order to frame the scope of such a release I made a listing of  
>> some
>> of the potential features for such a release at
>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=rFHYANxtkRfGYchi1QuS5dA. The  
>> list
>> is both non-exclusive and non-binding in the recommendations.
>>
>> The envisioned timeline for a Plone 3.5 release would be to aim for a
>> final release either by the time of the conference or by the end of  
>> this
>> year, giving us six months or a bit more for it. By aiming for an
>> after-summer beta deadline we will have a chance of leveraging some
>> Google Summer of Code contributions for such a release.
>>
>> When it comes to the official personal involved in such a new major
>> release, I'd like to suggest a slight deviation on our process. As  
>> many
>> to all of the features changes in question for the 3.5 release have  
>> so
>> far been in the scope of the 4.0 release, I'd suggest to appoint the
>> entire 4.0 framework team to be the official team for 3.5 as well.  
>> This
>> forces them to get involved with the process in a more defined and  
>> clear
>> way now.
>>
>> On the side of the release manager, Wichert has signaled that his
>> workload as a freelancer will not allow him to take over the  
>> shepherding
>> of a new major release. We do however have with Eric Steele of PSU  
>> fame
>> a well-known interested candidate for the position.
>>
>> This is only a proposal that needs community feedback and  
>> encouragement
>> at this point to make it into an official roadmap. The next steps  
>> are to
>> have an open discussion about this for the next one to two weeks.  
>> If it
>> meets general favor, we will appoint the new/old framework team and  
>> let
>> them recommend a release manager to the Foundation board for official
>> nomination.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hanno
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Framework-Team mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team

David Glick
Web Developer
ONE/Northwest

New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the  
environment

http://www.onenw.org
davidglick-PRw/[email protected]
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
mobile: (206) 679-3833

Subscribe to ONEList, our email newsletter!
Practical advice for effective online engagement
http://www.onenw.org/full_signup





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.