Re: The new Plone 4.0, was Re: Plone 3.5
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel,gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.teams.framework,gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 22:05, Ross Patterson <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry if I'm resurrecting an already fairly resolved debate. None of > the concerns I raise here are enough to vote -1 one calling it 4.0. But > if enough people feel as I do here, maybe we should discuss a little > further. What about plone 3.9? 3.0.x was very buggy, and I think that has been somewhat saved by the upgrades to 3.1 and 3.2 being so painless. I think it would be, for that reason, a big mistake to introduce bigger changes in 3.X unless we can make sure the upgrade is quite painless and the changes are *very* stable. -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com