Plone 3 vs. 2.5

Erik Rose <psucorp-Zk++F6nm1dJiRTfJsgHP3gC/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.teams.framework,gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel,gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> I don't consider it a disaster. To me it's more about the community  
> learning from mistakes, identifying areas of improvement and getting  
> better by each release. If we were more happy with Plone 2.5 than 3,  
> we would have a real problem. :)

Actually, 2.5 had a lot going for it. We still have several  
integrators who prefer 2.5 for its buildoutless installation and  
development, simpler theming, and lack of (to them) arbitrary  
divisions like portal_skins/portal_view_customizations that arise from  
phasing in the component architecture. Personally, I like 3 for a lot  
of other reasons, but I can relate to their pain points and look  
forward to spending my FWT votes to try to make things simpler and  
more consistent (which is hopefully the way we're going anyway).

Erik Rose
weblion.psu.edu
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.