Re: Let's turn off api.plone.org.
David Hostetler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'd suggest not having any specific information on that landing page at all, if in fact it's not going to ever host anything useful. The example you described is itself information that can and will get stale, compelling someone to maintain it, even if on a very low frequency. Rather, I'd suggest simply redirecting to a page back on plone.org that gives the short summary you suggested, along with a few relevant links to direct people further. That page can thus be maintained normally, like all other plone.org content. regards, -hoss David Hostetler [email protected] On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:48, Alex Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got a maintenance scheduled for tonight and cleaning up > is on the brain. To that end I asked Hanno in #plone-framework > about api.plone.org and he said: > 11:20 < aclark> hannosch: speaking of Plone, is there any chance in hell > that http://api.plone.org/ will > ever see anything useful or should we just turn it off? > I'd love to think we could put up > some sphinx docs or something there for Plone 4… > 11:20 <@hannosch> it won't ever show anything useful > 11:20 <@hannosch> there's no Plone API that can be exctracted from the > code > 11:21 <@hannosch> you either need to look at the full code or follow a > specific > tutorial on plone.org/docs > 11:21 <@hannosch> you cannot retrofit an API onto this beast anymore > > So I'd suggest we turn it off and end the confusion for good! Thoughts? > Further, it would probably make sense to leave a note saying: > Please see the Zope 2 Sphinx docs here: > http://docs.zope.org/zope2/zdgbook/source/ > and then look in http://plone.org/documentation for specific things. > > However, we'll need to be very careful about that as Hanno points out: > 11:33 <@hannosch> the Zope2 looks nice, but it tells you to develop > Zope2 > in the 1990-style. I wouldn't want to point anyone to it > 11:33 <@hannosch> some of the stuff about security and the catalog is > still > the same, but dtml, python scripts, the OFS nah > > Maybe something like: > Please see the relevant Zope 2 Sphinx docs here: > http://docs.zope.org/zope2/zdgbook/source/ > including: > - TAL > - Security > - Catalog > But you can ignore: > - DTML > - OFS > and then look in http://plone.org/documentation for help with: > - Installing add-ons > - Writing filesystem products > - Etc. > would do it? Anyway, let me know! My feeling is that anything is better > than outdated > and useless docs at this point (looking for a flurry of +1s here please > ;-). > > Alex > > -- > Alex Clark · http://aclark.net > Buy Practical Plone 3: http://tinyurl.com/practical-plone > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Plone-docs mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Plone-docs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs