Re: Proposal to manage documentation similar to (or along with) core software.

Alex Clark <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation
Organization ACLARK.NET, LLC
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2010-04-14, Martin Aspeli <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1000

Thanks for the enthusiastic reply :-)

> In the past, the problem has normally been commitment, not process,
> but I also think we've been getting a lot more mature in our
> documentation approach over the last few years so this may be a
> logical step.
>
> Before you can do any of this, though, you need at least 5-10
> volunteers who're willing to make a commitment similar to that the
> framework team members do. That's probably a couple of hours a week,
> on average.

That shouldn't be too hard. What's next, pitch to the PF?

> Martin
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev


-- 
Alex Clark · http://aclark.net
Author of Plone 3.3 Site Administration · http://aclark.net/plone-site-admin


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Plone-docs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.