Re: Proposal to manage documentation similar to (or along with) core software.
Israel Saeta Pérez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/09/2010 07:55 PM, Alex Clark wrote: > Hi, sorry meant to reply to this earlier… > > On 2010-04-21, Dylan Jay<[email protected]> wrote: > > … > >> We just need a nicer folder structure. >> >> Instead of >> >> http://plone.org/documentation/manual/plone-3-user-manual >> >> we could use >> >> http://plone.org/documentation/manual/3.x/user-manual >> >> and we could have a redirection to the latest e.g. >> >> http://plone.org/documentation/manual/latest/user-manual >> >> This would also mean we have 3 different versions of the manual page. >> Instead of >> >> http://plone.org/documentation/manual/ >> >> we would have >> >> http://plone.org/documentation/manual/2.5 >> http://plone.org/documentation/manual/3.x >> http://plone.org/documentation/manual/4.x >> >> >> KB just works like the existing PHC docs, except that anyone can go in >> and update the "versions" covered by a doc if a new plone version is >> released and the documentation is still relevant to the new version. Yes, but remember that the KB is based PHC too. > +1000. Let's make it happen… I will probably have some time this month. > > Of course, it'd be nice to get some other folks chiming in to agree > or disagree ;-) Can't we use collections here? We already have the version metadata in the manuals. -- israel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Plone-docs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-docs