Re: kb -> c.developermanual
Jon Stahl <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Jul 2011 19:19:01 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAM8toDek=kt5Lovgb_xuHXhcVzjLBSo5YRnu4Pmy0r8ruJyOPg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Dylan Jay <dylan-Q+/Sk2sTzaxWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote: > > On 07/07/2011, at 11:39 AM, Alex Clark wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> On 6/19/11 7:36 AM, Dylan Jay wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> There's lots of links in the collective developers manual to KB >>> articles. Is there any reason not to just import those documents >>> directly into the manual and remove the KB article? >> >> Yes. >> >> I'll state the obvious: because it may offend the KB article author. I >> suspect you'd need to contact the author directly and ask where they'd >> prefer their article to live. > > seems a shame as where we really want to go is non-repeated > documentation. > but I guess you're right, not worth coming up with a process until we > get manual publishing working. > > >> >> Note: we've still got a "mess" on our hands wrt to collective docs. >> I am >> hoping to clean up and automate the inclusion of c-docs in plone.org >> as >> soon as someone from the board replies to this ticket: >> >> * https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/11771 >> >> >> Right now we have: >> >> * Out of date c-docs on plone.org/documentation (because no one >> understands the upload process[1]). I'm now OK with fixing this >> (i.e. I >> know how to do it). > > I'm happy to fix any coding issues with the funnelweb import. Last > time I tried it was working. > > >> >> * Out of date c-docs on collective-docs.plone.org because your recent >> changes added a Sphinx module that does not exist on deus (includedocs >> IIRC). > > :) sorry about that. But will be worth it if all goes to plan and we > can kick start core devs into documenting their own work. > >> >> >> As I am not terribly interested in fixing deus[2], I've recently >> considered moving c-docs to github and publishing them to >> readthedocs.org (which moo has +1'd). But I still need to test. > > So replace collective-docs.plone.org with readthedocs? I think that's > a good idea. I'm not totally sure I'm up to speed with everything, but just wanted to restate that I hope the goal is still to integrate collective-docs into Plone.org/documentation, and have that be the One True Single Source for all this great documentation work. :jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2