Re: Why Plone?
"Dmitry S. Makovey" <dmitry-1Q/KASFKeDldKLj3K8Ij/[email protected]> Tue, 27 May 2003 10:01:49 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.educational |
|---|---|
| Organization | Athabasca Open University |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On May 27, 2003 08:58 am, tshooter91 wrote: > OK. I've been playing with Plone for about a week now. I really like > what I've seen so far, and think this definitely has the flexibility to > do what I would want an intranet/extranet site to do. I see that much > of what plone has is available in the Zope CMF, so what's the point of > using Plone? Why not just install zope and the CMF Products that are > needed? Plone is much more than CMF in many respects. For example it's _much_more_ user friendly than default CMF. Plus you'll have lot's of goodies out-of-the-box. In general, as far as I can tell plone grows into something bigger built on top of CMF. So in your case it's the same as saying after awhile "why use CMF, it's built on Zope. Let's use plai Zope". So Plone is a perfect tool for rapid development and deployment. If you'd like "the hard way" - go for it. :) Plus consider that plone little by little moves into it's own direction which is not quite the same as CMF even though they have much in common. That was my perception of what's Plone - maybe somebody can correct me if I'm wrong? - -- Dmitry Makovey Web Systems Administrator Athabasca University (780) 675-6245 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+04vtyDrVuGfS98QRAoniAJ0Xaf5jl1rxd3UMn/fxCWAWt00icACeNUu7 SfHWFXMMkQLx6S5VDi4bV0E= =4/gV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge