Re: 2.0.1 uploaded to SF

> Hum .. what is the package_plone.py script? .. The problem is that this
> tarball wasnt created with the dist_plone script i put into cvs. Also
> the PloneBase tarball contains a i18n folder with the translations which
> is wrong. The PloneBase tarball should only contain CMFPlone .. nothing
> more. This PloneBase tarball is then used with the dist_plone.py script
> to get a _defined_ set of plone dependencies. What comes out of it is
> the PloneCore tarball.

Ah... that's where the script is. No-one knew so I went ahead an made it up.

> I thought this has been discussed enough :) .. from my point of view the
> this tarball (2.0.1) is in pretty much the same undefined state as the
> 2.0 tarball before. Also the i18n team hasnt released a new version of
> the translations so the 0.1 version would have been the version to
> include with a tarball created. Else we again build releases without
> state directly from cvs.
> 
> Noone seems to have cared to update the dist_plone package definitions
> in cvs .. i dont know why :(

Because no-one knew that. I dont know when I'll be able to spare the 
hours it took to do that, so please go ahead and build that again and 
upload.
-- 
   Andy McKay
   ClearWind Consulting
   http://www.clearwind.ca


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297