Re: Proposal: buildout-based Plone Installer for Windows (PLIP #227)

Laurence Rowe <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel,gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.installers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Sidnei da Silva wrote:
>> Hi Tarek,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Tarek Ziade <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 1/ The pre-built story:
>>>
>>> I am wondering if we really need to ship prebuilt versions.. If I recall it
>>> correctly,
>>> a plain Plone doesn't need extra libs to be compiled, just a compiler.
>> But why would you compile everything on the target system? There's no
>> reason for that at all, it's just wasting resources.
>>
>>> And Mingw can be shipped with the installer, without having to be installed
>>> on the system
>>> itself. It is just a simple folder that can be linked to distutils.
>> That can be done yes.
> 
> I think it's nice if we can include a properly configured 
> (distutils.cfg) mingw with the Python install that comes with the 
> Windows installer, so that people can more easily compile future eggs.
> 
> Having the stock eggs pre-compiled is probably sensible though.
> 
> Martin
> 

Will normal win32 python extensions compiled against the standard 
windows python continue to function if we use Mingw?

On Windows I want to continue to be able to install python-ldap, 
database adapters, etc from their pre-built exe installer packages.

Laurence


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.