Re: c.documentviewer performance

Hang on, I see docsplit already has a branch called pdfshaver that
addresses the issues with GraphicsMagick and Ghostscript. So all the other
formats should remain unchanged.

On 27 April 2015 at 17:39, Nathan Van Gheem <[email protected]> wrote:

> Will have to check the implementation. For other doc types, it might use
> libre office to convert it to pdf and then the normal docsplit after that
> to split the document into images. So it might still speed up the
> conversation.
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Mike Metcalfe <mike-Aj4agZGutx/[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nathan,
>>
>> On 27 April 2015 at 13:50, Nathan Van Gheem <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice. Looks like we need to update c.documentviewer :)
>>>
>> I'll make start on a fork asap.
>>
>>> I asked this will only speed up pdf. Other document formats will be slow?
>>>
>> I didn't think of the other doc types.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nathan Van Gheem
> Solutions Architect
> Wildcard Corp
>



-- 
Mike Metcalfe

082 903 8268
mike-Aj4agZGutx/[email protected]
www.webtide.co.za

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y

_______________________________________________
Plone-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-users