Preferring Trac, fora and IRC to in-page comments (was: spam)
Graham Perrin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.website |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martin Aspeli wrote: > > … commenting so that people can offer additional insight. Comments are > valuable to other users, not just the original author as a report of a > problem, > 1. <http://dev.plone.org/plone/query?component=Documentation> 2. <http://plone.org/support/forums/docs> 3. <http://dev.plone.org/plone.org/> 4. <http://plone.org/support/forums/plone.org> 5. <http://plone.org/support/chat> and <http://weblion.psu.edu/chatlogs/%23plone/> 6. in-page comments IMHO the sixth avenue is one avenue too many, most likely to be overlooked, and least trackable (I never treat in-page comments as a discussion medium). > and no-one's going to find comments hidden in trac tickets. > Trac is, or should be, well attended. Any ticket in Trac that is of great significance might be referenced from the relevant page. Things in Trac that are of lesser significance can be discussed in the ticket and/or forum. Regards Graham -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/spam-tp2691557p2915521.html Sent from the plone.org Web Site mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Plone-website mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-website The Wiki: http://plone.org/development/current/projects/WebsiteTeam