Site and case study submissions

Hi all

I'm moderating site and case study submissions if I have a spare moment. 
Recently some have been coming through with poor English and bad spelling,
even after a couple of rounds of rejection. 

Should I be forgiving and publish? The linked sites are fine, the authors
just aren't native English speakers. 

Personally I feel that having bad English on the plone.org site is
unacceptable. Perhaps we should log submissions in need of editing as bugs,
but I suspect no one will get round to editing. In the end it's the
responsibility of the original authors to get the submission up to scratch
... maybe they could flattr editors to get them to polish their submissions. 

Another note: the sites are published at
http://plone.org/support/sites/sitename .. that seems like an awkward URL:
sitename does not constitute support for Plone at all, so it shouldn't be
under /support/. It is a marketing listing. Just
http://plone.org/sites/sitename looks fine to me. 

http://plone.org/support/case-studies/casestudy is slightly less bad, but
http://plone.org/case-studies/casestudy is still better. 

Finally: https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/11652

--
View this message in context: http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/Site-and-case-study-submissions-tp6598036p6598036.html
Sent from the plone.org Web Site mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention
Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth
analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/
_______________________________________________
Plone-website mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-website
The Wiki: http://plone.org/development/current/projects/WebsiteTeam