Re: Site and case study submissions

On 7/19/2011 5:00 AM, Jean Jordaan wrote:
> Should I be forgiving and publish? The linked sites are fine, the authors
> just aren't native English speakers.

You should edit them. It's not good to have poor narrative on the site. 
But rejecting the submissions back to people who don't have enough skill 
to fix them isn't the answer either. Reviewing submissions isn't a 
go/no-go process.

> Just
> http://plone.org/sites/sitename looks fine to me.

Me too.

> http://plone.org/support/case-studies/casestudy is slightly less bad, but
> http://plone.org/case-studies/casestudy is still better.

Yes, it is better.

-- 
Sincerely,

Chris Calloway http://nccoos.org/Members/cbc
office: 3313 Venable Hall   phone: (919) 599-3530
mail: Campus Box #3300, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC 27599

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention
Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth
analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/
_______________________________________________
Plone-website mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-website
The Wiki: http://plone.org/development/current/projects/WebsiteTeam