Re: Update - silva2odt

2007/6/26, eric casteleijn <[email protected]>:
> Of course, and we'd be happy to put it in our subversion repository as a
> separate project until then, if you like. I think for the speed of
> development it would make sense to keep it separate until it stabilizes
> a bit, maybe creating a separate Zope product for the Silva integration
> first, and then moving that into Silva when we expect no further major
> changes aside from bug fixes and new features. Maybe it would make sense
> to keep (a version of) it separate, though, since although it's of
> course tied to Silva, it doesn't need Silva or Zope to run.

IMHO it is separate, and putting it in svn that way would make it more
likely that it would be (found and) reused.

Kit

-- 
Kit BLAKE · Infrae · http://infrae.com/ + 31 10 243 7051
Hoevestraat 10 · 3033 GC · Rotterdam + The Netherlands
OpenPGP 0xE67AD0F2 · Contact = http://xri.net/=kitblake
_______________________________________________
silva-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.infrae.com/mailman/listinfo/silva-dev