Re: Silva Content Layout proposal
Marc Petitmermet <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:53:54 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.silva.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 30, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Andy Altepeter wrote: > Greetings Devs! > > Bethel University is the middle of a site redesign. We've partnered with a > leading US design firm that specialized in higher-ed websites. In addition to > the general site template (what is normally configured using the > content_layout macro or a SilvaLayout layout), we are getting about 12 page > layouts for specific types of web pages. > > Silva is currently not very capable of complex page layouts. Between the > header and footer and other required components of a page (e.g. nav menu, > breadcrumb, etc), anything beyond one column (i.e. a silva document) is > prohibitively difficult for our authors to create. One of our 12 layouts is a > "one column" layout. > > I've been thinking about this problem for a long time, and now it's time to > get to work. I've drafted a proposal on how I think content layouts should be > handled, and it's quite a dramatic shift on how the Silva editor functions. > We've looked at a number of leading open source CMS's and have found them > lacking. Commercial CMS's (like cascade server, sitecore, etc) do support > this in some fashion. I've heard rumors that Plone is heading this direction > as well. This is a pivotal moment in Silva's development. > > This proposal is a launchpad blueprint, here: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/silva/+spec/silva-content-layout > > I'd like to generate some discussion on this, and hopefully be able to > collaborate on this with other Silva institutions and Infrae. > Ultimately I want this to end up in Silva's core, becoming part of the > standard Silva CMS, so that everyone can enjoy it. > > The full specification is linked to from this blog post: > http://www.bethel.edu/web-services/blog/posts/2009/content-layout > I know other institutions are interested in this, so please tell me what you > think. andy, is there an easy way to check this out (some buildout configuration)? regards, marc