Re: silva metadata broken?

Marc Petitmermet wrote:

>> I think this is harmless, the form won't validate correctly because 
>> some data is missing or something, it's not a measure of whether your 
>> metadata set works or not. I get the same error and for me it works 
>> like a charm.
>
>
> this is disturbing. why can i test at all when it's known that the 
> test does not work? this should either work or all the irrelevant or 
> non-working tabs should be removed.
>
/me mutters something along the lines of 'amen'...

> although this is a workaround for the problem i really don't like 
> this. in my opinion this is a bug and should be fixed. e.g. i have a 
> listfield and "Select First Item" is selected. therefore, there IS a 
> initial value. looking at the silva-extra and silva-content 
> metadatasets there are also no default values set. hopefully, this is 
> only a bug with the listfields (i just tested the multicheckboxfield 
> and this does work without problems).
>
> thanks anyway for the temporary workaround.
> (shall i create an issue in the issuetracker?)
>
I'm not sure, perhaps Martijn should think about how this should work 
and if it's a bug or not, I don't know enough about the Metadata system 
nor Formulator to answer that. It might be I'm overlooking something 
trivial, not sure. Martijn?

Cheers,

Guido