Re: plans for reference management

Roman Joost <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.silva.devel
Organization Infrae
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 12:16:05AM +0200, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar wrote:
>   Roman: is it ok for You if I dump in an initial revision of the
>   SilvaReferenceChecker to the CVS, or would You prefer to create a
>   fresh "SilvaLinkChecker" in the first place?

>   Looking in the cold ashes of my last attempt to improve the
>   reference service (quite a year ago ..) I found ruins of something
>   which tried to do something vaguely similar to the "LinkDatabase" of
>   the CMFLinkChecker -- i.e. store the links/references so they do not
>   have to be fetched on every run. As this would have replaced the
>   current "SilvaReferenceChecker" anyway, by importing my sources I do
>   not mean to make any predecision about how to proceed, e.g. if to
>   port CMFLinkChecker or just port the part using the lms and grow its
>   own instead.  (We can reuse the part retrieving the references
>   anyway, I hope.)
> 
>   Well, importing something would make a decision about the name, I
>   guess ...  (at least until migrated to subversion ... ;-) Any
>   opinions?
In the "link checking point of view":

  Well, I think that some people know the CMFLinkChecker already. So, a
  likewise called product name for Silva would be a nice move. But, you
  made the initial development of the SilvaReferenceChecker. If you think,
  better to rely on your product, because the Silva world recognizes this
  as a product for link checking, we should use this name.

If you already consider to enhance this product to a full reference
management suite, I think "SilvaReferenceManager" would be more
suitable.  

Greetings,
-- 
Roman Joost
www: http://www.romanofski.de
email: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
silva-dev mailing list
silva-dev-IAPFreCvJWM6s/[email protected]
http://lists.infrae.com/mailman/listinfo/silva-dev
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCZPVH8CscaEkpx0IRAjI8AJ9+NC/qxp5vwxqEb6tsVS4uYEDOMgCcDShf
CQ93zhm+JJHvsXHMyKmVdk8=
=IF7R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.