Re: ZEO vs NEO

Hi Jim,

As you have mentioned  in your post, when are you planning to make this 
available:



* Per-object rather than global server commit locks, and a shorter window 
for commit locks. *

-Sanjay Rao



On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 16:58:23 UTC+5:30, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> I really like the NEO architecture, at least at a high level.  I 
> haven't studied it in detail.  I've been planning to work toward a 
> similar architecture with ZEO.  A big stumbling block for me has been 
> NEO's GPL license. 
>
> I was speaking with Jean-Paul Smets the other day and we discussed 
> adjusting NEO's license to make it more broadly usable.  He suggested 
> making the client LGPL.  Hypothetically, If NEO eventually replaced 
> ZEO and had an LGPL license, would the LGPL license present a problem 
> for anyone? 
>
> If the LGPL isn't a problem, I'd put a lot more effort into looking at 
> NEO as a client-server architecture for ZODB, likely as a replacement 
> for ZEO. 
>
> So does the LGPL present a problem to anyone? 
>
> Jim 
>
> -- 
> Jim Fulton 
> http://jimfulton.info 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zodb" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.