Re: Re: Spending a lot more time on ZODB

Michael Egorov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.zodb
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for kind words Chris!

I think, many things are possible indeed with ZODB. As soon as it is 
performant and scalable. Often ORMs are used where ZODB is a better choice. 
Or ZODB (maybe through ZeroDB) could be a good fit in a brave new world of 
decentralized applications?

Best way to help would be to get involved into open source community, 
contribute to core code, write applications on top of ZeroDB, wrappers for 
non-python languages, or simply bring ideas.

On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 9:16:40 PM UTC+1, Christopher Lozinski wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/29/16 4:38 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: 
> > Great news -- congratulations on the new job! 
>
> I think it is great that Jim is going to be working full time on ZODB. 
>
> But the real story here is ZeroDB.  There is a fire under that company, 
> people are really interested in what they are doing. 
> Customers want to host in the cloud securely. 
>
> Who gets the credit? 
>
> ZODB does.  It is all in Python, it is easy for people to hack it and 
> create new things, and one of those new things, one 
> that is doing well in the market,  is ZeroDB.  And Jim benefits by 
> getting the work and income from that company. 
>
> All are happy. 
>
> So what is the next great invention on top of ZODB going to be? 
>
> And what can we do to help make ZeroDB successful? 
>
> Chris 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zodb" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.