Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer)
Jim Fulton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zodb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPDm-Fjy5cGPMMiqict4STjXsP_hVWRtHCQ667Ci2LbUerOqmQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Jim Fulton <[email protected]> wrote: ... > What makes more sense is to split ZODB's MVCC support into a separate > layer that's applied to storages **other than** RelStorage as an > adapter. When a database is created, it will check if a storage > provides IMVCCStorage. If it doesn't, it will apply an adapter to it > that does. Connection will assume that it has an IMVCCStorage and act > accordingly. ... > I don't think I'm going to do this right now. Getting invalidations > right might be kind of tricky and there are too many other pans on the > fire right now, at least for me, to add this. I changed my mind. Doing this now, will make the ZODB5 release simpler, because it won't break RelStorage. https://github.com/zopefoundation/ZODB/pull/66 Jim -- Jim Fulton http://jimfulton.info -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zodb" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.