Re: [dev] Better tpc_finish (was Re: [dev] RFC IMVCCStorage everywhere (Move ZODB's MVCC to storage layer))

Le 06/16/16 22:29, Jim Fulton a écrit :
> - There are some special cases where undo or tpc_vote should return
> serials for without conflicts, because objects were modified via unto.
> The serials in this case may be None, as long as tpc_finish returns a
> tid.

Thanks. Now that explains something I quickly wrote in a NEO test:

>                 storage.undo(tid, txn)
>             storage.tpc_finish(txn)
>             t.begin()
>             value = ob.value
>             ob._p_invalidate() # BUG: this should not be required
>             self.assertEqual(ob.value, 3)

> Thoughts?

More another day.

Julien

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zodb" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.