Re: Thinking of splitting off ZEO server into a separate package
Jim Fulton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zodb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPDm-Fg8_S3Bgi+DdRgKP=KEnaVL9-DS2Yzvyeb=kZ7Rejomvw@mail.gmail.com> |
FTR: https://github.com/zopefoundation/ZEO/pull/54 This worked very well. Caught some bugs, including a subtle bug that I wouldn't have thought to test for on my own. This argues for splitting the client and server in the future. Jim On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Jim Fulton <[email protected]> wrote: > This was too hard. :) I'm doing something easier for now. I'm making a > copy of the ZEO4 server that I've tested with ZEO4. > > Jim > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Jim Fulton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Mostly brainstorming... >> >> With ZEO5 there are some changes to the ZEO protocol. In the past, we've >> made protocol changes mostly by thinking hard about backward compatibility. >> There are even a few tests that try to test different protocol, but these >> rely on knowing what sorts of things might go wrong, and there aren't many >> of them. By splitting the server into its own package, we can run >> automated integration tests with different versions of client and server. >> >> Can anyone think of a reason why this would be a bad idea? I'll probably >> start on this tomorrow. >> >> Jim >> >> -- >> Jim Fulton >> http://jimfulton.info >> > > > > -- > Jim Fulton > http://jimfulton.info > -- Jim Fulton http://jimfulton.info -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zodb" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.