Re: too many database conflicts when using ZODB with int ids and indexes
Jason Madden <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zodb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <-6612316001632518648@unknownmsgid> |
On Nov 10, 2016, at 8:59 AM, Jim Fulton <[email protected]> wrote: At ZC, we mitigated this problem by storing persistent ids on objects and getting rid of the whole persistent key mechanism (which was rather complicated) and the persistent key -> integer id mapping. I don't remember if we ever released this, but looking, it doesn't seem we did. If your conflicts are in the object -> ids mapping (the internal ``ids`` attribute, I'd consider making a version of the utility that got rid of this mapping. Perhaps consider this utility: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.intid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zodb" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.