Re: Impact of persistent NVM Memory (pnvm) on ZODB's performance
Jim Fulton <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Oct 2017 07:36:32 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zodb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPDm-FgLKvL_7cG0X3sUcx3sAkztYBg3=igL1R0j0K19DvxB9A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Yashwardhan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am new to zodb and am interested in knowing if persistent non-volatile > memory, will help in speeding up zodb. > I'm not sure what you mean here. Are you referring to something like Intel's Optane technology? > Is there any benchmark available for zodb for performance evaluation? > Not really, because ZODB applications can vary so much. (There's ZODB shootout, but that's really a database server benchmark.) > With persistent nvm. the objects which needs to be persistent can be > directly allocated on it and thus might help in getting rid of pickling > cost. Any comments? > Again, I'm not sure what technology you're referring to. AFAIK, Optane is ~100x slower than DRAM, so, IDK that I'd want to use it directly. I'd be inclined to use it for some kind of cache. I don't think that unpickling is a major performance factor. Jim -- Jim Fulton http://jimfulton.info -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zodb" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.