Re: Built-in/standard/default catalog for ZODB?

I actually use Hypatia. Documentation is probably not complete but I found
it simple and easy to use.
Ho, I have to say that I use Zope interfaces very much so it's not a
problem for me...

Regards,
Thierry

2017-10-30 17:30 GMT+01:00 Fred Drake <[email protected]>:

> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Christopher Lozinski
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Repoze.catalog, looks pretty good, but also pretty dumb.  A simple
> interface change would make it much better.  The repose.catalog
> > api mentions object id.  Duh.  Every object has an internal oid.  So
> instead of passing around object ids, just assume that the
> > object id is the old, and then do not return object ids, but return the
> objects themselves .
>
> I haven't used repoze.catalog myself, but the real reason not to
> create the objects (even as ghosts) is to avoid (possibly expensive)
> ghost creation for a lot of objects you aren't going to use.  This can
> have a significant impact in paging implementations, as well as cases
> where additional filtering is going to happen.  It's not unusual to
> want to do a few queries and then just use an intersection of the
> results.
>
>
>   -Fred
>
> --
> Fred L. Drake, Jr.    <fred at fdrake.net>
> "A storm broke loose in my mind."  --Albert Einstein
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "zodb" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
http://www.imagesdusport.com -- http://www.ztfy.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zodb" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.