Re: Question about "storage" argument

I actually use separate storages in a single ZEO server for several
low-traffic applications.
For this kind of usage I still find it useful.
And even if I only have a single storage, I like to give it a distinct name
instead of default "1" name...  ;)

Regards,
Thierry

2018-02-05 14:58 GMT+01:00 Jim Fulton <[email protected]>:

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Thierry Florac <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed while reading ZEO documentation that the "storage" argument
>> which can be used to open a ZEO connection is not defined anywhere.
>>
>
> That's an omission (documentation bug).
>
>
>> Did ZEO storages management became deprecated?
>>
>
> I wish. :) I've never found it useful and have found it to be an
> attractive nuisance.
>
> I would generally prefer separate storages to be in separate servers so
> they don't compete for the GIL.
>
> Other people tell me this is useful for hosting many customers, perhaps
> dynamically, in a single storage server, where performance isn't an issue.
> I suspect there are better ways to achieve the goals behind this in the
> long run.
>
> <shrug>
>
> Jim
>
> --
> Jim Fulton
> http://jimfulton.info
>



-- 
http://www.imagesdusport.com -- http://www.ztfy.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "zodb" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.