Re: zope.sendmail having dependency on zope.app.comonent
Philipp von Weitershausen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zope3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael Howitz wrote: > while looking at the dependencies of packages in the zope.* namespace at > gocept we found out that zope.sendmail depends on zope.app.component. Just to make sure: If we ever had a formal distinction of the zope.* and zope.app.* namespaces, I think we've abandoned it a while ago already. So, it doesn't matter whether a package is in zope.* or zope.app.*, we need to take all interdependencies (also the ones in zope.app.*) into account. So all in all I don't think it's a big problem in zope.sendmail depended on zope.app.component, as long as zope.app.component wouldn't depend on a gazillion other things... > zope.sendmail needs zope.app.component.vocabulary.UtilityVocabulary to > define a vocabulary for the utilities implementing > zope.sendmail.interfaces.IMailDelivery. > > So we'd suggest to move zope.app.component.vocabulary.UtilityVocabulary > out of the zope.app.* namespace because it is a generic vocabulary. > Possible places for UtilityVocabulary could be zope.component (because > the concept of utilities is defined there) or zope.schema (because the > concept of vocabularies is defined there). > zope.schema seems to be the better place because zope.component does not > depend on zope.schema yet. But zope.schema does in no way depend on zope.component. > zope.app.component then can import UtilityVocabulary from the new place > to avoid deprecation. -- http://worldcookery.com -- Professional Zope documentation and training