Re: What does python 3000 mean for zope?

Hey,

Tres Seaver wrote:
[snip]
> Frankly, I'm uninterested in spending *any* effort on Py3K support:
> we'd be more likely to get traction out of Jython / IronPython (which
> are alreday stable, and run on platforms we don't yet support).

More far-fetched but still in some ways more in reach than Python 3 
would be to look into PyPy. In a few years time it may be worthwhile due 
to platform support, interesting interpreter extensions and performance 
benefits. It's more of a long bet though, that one.

Regards,

Martijn