Re: Re: RFC: Known working sets

On 4 Sep 2007, at 10:15 , Chris Withers wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> As far as I understand your use case, i twould already be covered  
>> by my original proposal: you always have the option to locally  
>> override what's specified in the working set.
>
> I think Dieter may have meant something like:
>
>   [grok-0.11]
>   grok = 0.11
>   ZODB = 3.8.0-3.8.4
>   zope.component = 3.4.0,3.5.1,3.5.2

Ah. Interesting. I hadn't considered ranges before. It *does* make  
the whole algorithm more complicated, though.

> I'm still a bit disappointed that we can't get this kind of support  
> from distutils.

The question is whether that's a job for distutils / setuptools or not.