Re: RFC: Known working sets
Tres Seaver <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zope3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dieter Maurer wrote: > Wichert Akkerman wrote at 2007-9-4 09:12 +0200: >> ... >> Linux distros take an approach that does not fit in the python world >> though: their meta-set is a release with its own package database. In >> other words every distribution/meta-set has its own PyPI instance database. > > Not sure that I understand this correctly. > > If I do, then focus on a single distribution, e.g. "Debian edge". > This should be similar to the one "PyPI" database. > > Now, consider a ".deb" package, similar to one in the "Debian" distro > but not identical. > > I assume that is about Tres szenario... Perhaps we need to think of the "known good" set as a "PyPI subset", which is maintained in the same way that the various Debian distro lists are: they may end up pulling packages from the same "pool", but they don't expose versions / packages which have not been "opted in" to the set. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [email protected] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG3Z7u+gerLs4ltQ4RAk6GAJ9A9RjMrUvylKGzJjezDuPa+u6SagCgjwXE u4GRIDX7tI5HnM8Q5utvRJU= =qi21 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----