Re: Re: RFC: Known working sets

Philipp von Weitershausen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.zope3
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 4 Sep 2007, at 16:13 , Jim Fulton wrote:
> How would the "known_working_versions" be used?  You haven't  
> specified that.

You're right, I forgot that. In buildout.cfg, you'd then say:

   [buildout]
   versions = egg:grok==0.11

which would load the grok 0.11 egg before doing anything else,  
inspect its known working versions data and then do the rest of the  
work.

> Presumably this would be something that is overridable. How would  
> this be overridden?

Overridability would work like it does now, a la:

   [buildout]
   versions = egg:grok==0.11, version_overrides

   [version_overrides]
   ZODB3 = 3.9.0

> I'm very much against making setuptools *more* complicated than it  
> already is.

Sounds reasonable.

> Perhaps buildout (and setuptools) should grow a mechanism for being  
> able to override/resolve version conflicts.

That might be enough already. Then we could use meta eggs to express  
working sets and the buildout versions=... mechanism to override  
those versions. It should also be possible to resolve a version  
conflict between, say, the meta egg (the working set) and a  
particular package you're using by letting zc.buildout (or  
setuptools) know which dependencies take precendence, e.g.::

   [buildout]
   version_precedence = MyApp grok Zope

which would mean that MyApp's dependencies take precendence over  
grok's dependencies which again take precendence over the Zope meta  
egg's dependencies.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.