Re: zope.testbrowser packaging
Jim Fulton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zope3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
extras are a terrible feature. They aren't fully supported by setuptools and they make it more complicated. Did you write tests for every permutation of your extras? Jim On Sep 15, 2007, at 9:44 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Saturday 15 September 2007 08:48, Benji York wrote: >> 1) introduce a "zope" extra that everyone will have to use (basically >> just rename "test" to "zope"; > > I prefer this solution. I have done this before for z3c.rml, where > I put the > page template support into a "pagetemplate" extra declaration. I > liked this > solution a lot. I would have never considered developing another > package for > a fairly trivial extension of a few lines. I think eggs have the > potential > for package proliferation and senseless overhead. > > Regards, > Stephan > -- > Stephan Richter > CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) > Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training > _______________________________________________ > Zope3-dev mailing list > [email protected] > Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/jim%40zope.com > -- Jim Fulton mailto:[email protected] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org