Re: Proposal, free views
"Lennart Regebro" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zope3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/23/07, Roger Ineichen <[email protected]> wrote: > Heads up, > > Please review this proposal. OK. I have to admit that I don't fully understand it. > This proposal describes a way to make the usage of such built in views optional. "Such built in views" means what? "Optional" how? And why? "The additional component.zcml could be used to include only component related configuration whitout the view parts defined in the browser.zcml. Because the browser.zcml get's included from the configure.zcml but not from the component.zcml" OK, I understand what you want to do: Start the practice of having views in one zcml and components in another, so you can include only the component one if so desired. I don't understand why, though. "Right now it's not possible to use another layout pattern without to support zmi_views and zmi_action and it's menut item pattern. The views defined in all packages also require the use-macro, fill-slot pattern which is not what we allways whant. Right now there is no option to get rid of this patterns except to duplicate packages and replace existing views." That's what you will have to do anyway. Because if you don't include the views, you will have to replace them in another package. And you can override them in another package already... -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64