Re: Re: reasonable syntax for multi-adaptation
Jim Fulton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.zope3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 26, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote: > Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-9-26 11:29 -0400: >> ... >>> IFoo(x) >>> IBar(multi=(x,y)) >> >> Actually, that is not the case. If x already provides IFoo, then in >> the first case, the existing object is retuned. Nothing is >> instantiated. OTOH, in: >> >> getMultiAdapter([x], IFoo) >> >> or >> getAdapter(x, IFoo) >> >> either there is an error or some factory will be called. x won't be >> returned unless the factory happens to return it. > > Is this not an irrelevant implementation detail? No, the specified behavior is different. Jim -- Jim Fulton Zope Corporation